THE CATEGORY
CABINET

Their one big question was how much darker the ending should have gone, especially around Nick's fate at the recital.

They ask what happens to Murdock and Rambo afterward, then debate Stallone versus Schwarzenegger.

Questions cover Cal and Carly’s future, slingshot drafting, product placement, the Playgirl shoot, and praying to baby Jesus.

They leave open how good Daniel really is and who the best non-sensei ally would be in a real fight.

They end by batting around impossible wish-logic questions without reaching a firm answer.

The conversation ends on whether Burns is fundamentally a good actor and what his career choices meant.

Their final unanswered-question award goes to the status of the Tokyo deal, with the family relationship fallout as the next-best mystery.

They raise several movie logic questions, including Peyton's past, the Sonics, and the ending, without resolving them.

They call the monolith builders the movie’s biggest unanswered question, while also debating HAL’s motives and the film’s open-ended meaning.

They revisit the bag-of-poop and shower-prep questions without reaching a supportable answer.

The conversation drifts into unresolved plot questions like how long the relationship lasts and who really did the killing.

They raise several open-ended questions, led by Maggie’s post-story career path and the film’s missing backstory details.

They raise the babysitter-age issue and Jacob’s unexplained job as questions the movie never fully answers.

The hosts settle on “Who’s the Zodiac?” as the key unanswerable question, alongside broader questions about obsession and handwriting expertise.

They leave Terry’s school-record logistics unresolved.

They pose several open questions about the couple's future and the logistics of the trip home without reaching a firm answer.

The hosts float several hypotheticals about casting and ending choices without settling on a definitive answer.

They spend time asking what really happened overnight and what Lisa’s post-movie existence would have been like, but don’t resolve it cleanly.

They bounce around several logic questions, including Carla’s strategy, the practicality of silencers, and how the conspiracy could work so cleanly.

They pose several logic questions about the timeline, Michael's movements, and the hospital setup without answering them definitively.

Bill turns the segment into a whole discussion about whether Redford wore a wig or just had extraordinary hair.

They revisited the burial-ground chain of events as the biggest unresolved logic problem.

They tossed out a few speculative hypotheticals without landing on a single definitive answer.

They toss out several unanswered plot and life questions, including Jacob's death, the sex scene, and Amish life hypotheticals.

They end up wondering what the vampires do for the next six decades after the movie's ending.

They explore a robot/replicant theory for the movie’s world but never resolve it.

The key unanswerable question was what Lorene knew in the phone call, which the film deliberately leaves ambiguous.

They pose the next-day media reaction as the lead unanswerable, alongside questions about Gruber’s plan and the movie’s alternate ending implications.

They pose several impossible-to-answer questions, led by how Babe could possibly get his damaged tooth treated.

The hosts use the category to debate moral and plot questions, but do not land on a definitive winner.

They say the movie still never really explains Richie’s motive for killing Bobby Lupo.

They end with logistical questions about the cover-up and Kersey's work situation that the movie never answers.

They pose open questions about the couple’s future, the embassy sprint, the legality of the seduction, and the geopolitical effects of cold fusion.

They toss around several hypotheticals about the movie's alternate timeline and character choices without settling on one answer.

They pose several unresolved questions, especially about when the Cruise-Kidman romance started and what might have changed in the cast if Duvall had taken another role.

They use the category to revisit the Best Picture upset and speculate on how different the film would have been with a different director or awards context.

They leave the section with lingering questions about Don's home life, the coaching decisions, and how the team would have been priced.

They ended with speculative questions about the film's universe and aftermath, including Miggs, Precious, and Buffalo Bill's habits.

They flag several logic holes, especially the son’s impossible travel across Los Angeles and Hawk’s unlikely relationship with the ex-wife.

They debate whether the film still works after the twist is known, with mixed reactions but general admiration for its mechanics.

They focused on Billy’s possible cocaine use and the unanswered mechanics of the business and plot.

They ask and answer several impossible-to-prove questions, with Rudy's jacket odor and the annoyance rankings among the examples.

They talked through a few questions about concierges, the hotel's Soviet-era survival, and ownership, but did not settle on a single answerable winner.

They end up on a relationship question and a broader dodgeball-the-sport question as the main unresolved ideas.

They toss around several impossible-to-answer questions, including Billy’s total conquests, pitch count, and what his hand injury really looked like.

The hosts explicitly cancel the category because they feel the movie offers no meaningful unanswered questions.

They pile up unresolved questions about Kelly Leak, Joey Turner, and Mrs. Turner without a clear answer.

They keep circling the same unresolved logic problems, especially whether the film actually fixes the timeline in a coherent way.

The category centers on the frog storm and the film’s refusal to explain its biggest cosmic interruptions.

They end with an open-ended question about why Matthew Broderick keeps playing weird side characters and how that became his lane.

They ask practical questions about the murder-for-hire price and the location of the burger-and-prostitutes spot, but do not resolve either one.

They leave open the film’s biggest ambiguity, especially Lana’s motives and Miles’s hostility toward Joel.

The segment turns into a series of open-ended nitpicks and timeline questions without a clean consensus answer.

They mostly riff on how the story would have played in the internet era without settling on a single answer.

They toss around several philosophical and practical movie questions without choosing a single definitive answer.

They raise a few unresolved movie questions, especially about the cake-jump paycheck and Ryback’s offscreen abilities.

The hosts explicitly frame Sid's nudity at suicide as the main unanswerable question, while also revisiting the pregnancy issue.

The hosts riff on implausibilities like explosions, historical speech, and how Azeem’s tech would seem magical to the locals.

They raise several unresolved lore questions, especially the supernatural mechanics of the jackal pregnancy.

They use the segment to debate Russo’s 1990s career and broader movie-industry questions that don’t have neat answers.

They raise unresolved plot questions about the aunt’s past, the weekend honeymoon travel, and why several narrative details don’t quite add up.

They raise a batch of unresolved world-building questions, especially about the aliens' logistics and technology.

The hosts raise unresolved questions about who planted the car bomb and how a Scorsese version would differ, but no definitive answers emerge.

They raise a series of speculative questions about hacking, the romance, and the movie's logic without reaching a clear answer.

They treat the fire-alarm theory and the ending whisper as the main unresolved mysteries, alongside Charlotte’s later life.

They pose several mysteries, including the bathroom office, the ending mask, how the orgy guests identify Bill, and whether the movie is a dream.

They flag questions like where Christie Brinkley is going and where Wally World is actually located, without a single agreed answer.

They pile up several unanswered case questions, but none receives a definitive resolution.

They floated several unresolved questions about the ending, the Antichrist, and Pacino’s age and motives.

They pose three open questions about salt luck, snow owls, and the amount of money in the suitcase without resolving them definitively.

They say the biggest unanswered question is how Carl's career and life path led to the film's starting point.

They raise multiple unresolved plot questions, especially about the contract, the dogs, Shackleford, and the business card.

They spend the segment piling up sequel and logic questions about Josh, Susan, Billy, and the aftermath of the wish.

They flag the central friendship as hard to fully explain and leave the question open-ended.

They raise practical survival questions about water, disease, and the logistics of the deserted city without landing on a single answer.

They pile up several unanswered legal and practical questions, led by Mickey’s money and the missing witness problem.

They treat the title question and the short timeline as the main things the movie never fully explains.

They raise several unresolved story questions, with the boathouse and Ned’s competence the biggest ones.

The hosts use this to riff about logistics and plausibility rather than choose a single answerable winner.

They raise a handful of unresolved observations, including Dumb and Dumber parallels and whether Pineapple Express should be sativa or indica.

The discussion centers on several plot holes that the movie never cleanly explains, led by Chloe's inexplicable presence in the dorm shower scene.

The strongest unresolved question they settle on is how long Spacey’s character would realistically remain at the company.

They wonder about the relationship fallout and the missing legal cleanup after the heroes break out and kill more people.

They debate how Charlie could have protected himself in the hearing and how Slade's weekend spending and behavior would play out afterward.

They spent this section on a few big unanswered production questions and then gave the Beatles-song rights story as the check-getter answer.

This segment stayed exploratory, with no single answerable winner and the hosts instead piling up plausibility arguments and hypotheticals.

They say the only unresolved questions mostly concern the details of Annie's nursing and escape history.

They spend the most time wondering why Wheelchair Robert never appears, while also debating the dog’s survival and Costa’s future.

They say the film does not leave many substantive unanswered questions because it is largely rooted in a known true story.

They raise a string of practical questions, centered on Ben’s money and how he can afford his life.

They ask several open-ended questions, but the chokehold-cop thread is the main one they want more background on.

They framed several lingering plot questions, especially whether Clubber killed Mickey and what happened to Clubber afterward.

They raise several open questions about the logistics and geography of the movie, but none are answered definitively.

The discussion turns into a franchise debate about how well the Austin Powers series held up as a trilogy and what other franchises compare.

The hosts debated the film’s biggest unresolved mystery and then added several other open questions from the ending.

They toss out hypotheticals about alternate directors and a Netflix remake without reaching a single settled answer.

They debate the film’s logic and plausibility, including the plot mechanics, the Christmas-movie question, and whether McClane could have been played by someone else.

They toss around speculative questions about the final sex scene, the ending, and alternate outcomes without settling on a winner.

They riff on unresolved follow-up questions about the families, Sandy's fate, and whether other characters could have paired off.

The segment stays hypothetical, moving from a sequel idea to speculation about Kevin Buckman's adult life.

They leave unresolved questions about the timeline of Ethan's death, Rachel and Sydney's marriage length, and other backstory gaps.

They toss around speculative questions about Beth’s future, Conrad’s college, and the couple’s pre-breakup sex life without settling on answers.

They toss out unresolved plot questions like whether certain characters died or who really blew up Sam's car.

They speculate about a follow-up centered on Ralph Cox, but don't settle on a real answer.

They speculate about which sports star would have been the right celebrity pairing for Cindy Herron, but leave it as an open thought experiment.

They fantasize about alternate casting and conclude Cruise would be the strongest hypothetical lead, with Will Smith close behind.

They pose several hypothetical questions about the movie and its sequel/remake possibilities without a single agreed answer.

In the only clear comparison, they decide the final football-game sequence is crazier to attend than the earlier Billy Cole scene.

They talk through several open questions, but most emphatically land on being glad the sequel exists despite being bad.

They spend time on box-score guesswork, slow-clap origins, and other trivia that does not produce a single settled winner.

They mostly speculate on post-movie futures, but settle on Newman winning the final match and move into broader hypotheticals.

This segment stayed as a list of questions about the cult, the nitrous boost, hero-ball, the evil cop plot, and other unanswered logic holes.

They pile up several plot and character questions about the ending, the pregnancy, the evidence, and Costigan’s behavior without resolving them.

They treat Artie’s survival as the biggest mystery, while also wondering if the film helped inspire Little Nicky.

The hosts raise speculative questions about the assassin’s donut habit, the fee amount, and pop-culture history, but do not settle them as awards.

They toss out hypotheticals about the funeral coverage, Keanu's future teaching, and whether the Bulls-Heat game actually matched the movie.

They toss around hypotheticals about a series adaptation and which character each host would be, without settling on a firm winner.

The segment ranges across several speculative questions about the characters’ futures and the movie’s influence.

They raise several plot questions about Hatch’s choices, the escape mechanics, and the Nazi response without settling them.

They raise a string of speculative questions without settling on a definitive answer.

The only notable question they land on is whether Bruiser invented dog television, which they leave hanging.

The hosts raised several questions without settling them, including the origins of 'Booyah' and the film’s influence on later catchphrases.

They ask who 14-year-old and current Koppelman preferred between PJ Soles and Sean Young, but it stays a preference exercise rather than a winner decision.

They debate alternate endings and whether the movie could work as a series, but no single answer is chosen.

They pose several open questions about logistics, the cattle’s fate, and the movie’s implausibilities without settling on answers.

The hosts pose a string of questions about the film's logistics and backstory, including the bullwhip sale, the ark's handling, and why certain choices were made.

They debate the film’s central ambiguity, especially whether Teddy’s final story is true and what is really happening to Leonard.

They raise a string of unanswered movie questions without landing a definitive resolution.

They use the category to talk around various impossible modern-remake questions without landing on a clear answer.

They asked several unresolved questions about Brian Cox's alternate career path, FBI pay, and the movie's home-movie logic.

They present several hypotheticals, but the Family Feud matchup gets the clearest answer, with the Cosbys favored at peak and the Murtaughs over the long haul.

They use the final stretch to ask hypothetical questions about the movie’s aftermath and heist strategy.

They raise a few sequel and plot aftermath questions, but the main unresolved one is why the film never got a sequel.

They raise broad logic questions about hauntings, parenting, and astral travel rather than settling on a single answer.

They move into open questions like how Clive Owen knew the Nazi secret, whether the story works as a series, and which countries border Albania.

This segment is presented as a grab bag of lingering questions, including the books in the set dressing and Morrison’s relationship to the film’s details.

The hosts raise several logic problems about the campus, the cops, and the frat-house neighbors without resolving them into a winner.

They use the final stretch to throw out a series of unresolved questions, led by why Arsenio Hall never made more films.

They debate whether parts of the film are dreamlike, what the rearview-mirror sound means, and what a 2021 Travis Bickle would even look like, without reaching a firm answer.

They pose questions about fish-tank diamonds, the ending, and the prison escape, but none has a definitive answer.

They joke through timeline and sequel-logic questions and never settle on a supportable winner because the bit is intentionally open-ended.

The hosts raise practical time-travel and Los Angeles geography questions without landing on a single definitive answer.

The hosts raise several questions about Teasel, Rambo, and the logistics of the pursuit, but no single answer is settled.

They end by wondering how the family could afford their lifestyle, while agreeing they don't want the film remade as a TV series.

The conversation drifted into unanswered lore questions about the cop, the bakery, the puppies, and the future of Annie and Ted.

They toss around several speculative questions, including the coach’s sexuality and whether Mr. Holland should have invited Rowena or the principal.

They end by proposing that Damon may be the all-time best at delivering the phrase 'fuck it.'

They focus on unresolved story mechanics like how the media reacts, how long the love story lasts, and what really happened offscreen.

They ask several plot-hole questions, led by what happens to Machine after Cage leaves him stabbed and alone.

They close with unresolved questions about Buzz's girlfriend photo, Frank's family, Marley seeing the flooded house, and Kevin's long-term trauma.

The hosts pose and debate several Toy Story logic puzzles, but none is treated as a final answerable winner.

They argue through hypothetical outcomes for the election and Rumson’s future without arriving at a firm answer.

They pose questions about Carl, Pazuzu, Reagan’s future, the house’s aftermath, and related plot logic without reaching a definitive answer.

The hosts debated long-form actor career comparisons, but never landed on a single definitive answer.

The hosts move through several unanswerable questions about Watney’s family life, his post-rescue dating life, and the logistics of being married to an astronaut.

Their biggest unresolved question was why Olive’s brother disappears from the college setup, with the chlamydia chain also left a bit murky.

They treated Paul's death and Richard Gere's acting quality as the episode's main unresolved questions.

They raise lingering questions about Kobayashi, the boat job, and Soze’s strategy without settling them.

The episode ends this category by asking whether Raul graduated in real life, which they cannot answer from the film.

They posed several unresolved questions, including the timeline, the cell block's business viability, and what really happened to Coughlin.

They ask what the movie would look like in the 2020 internet/incel era and whether Andy’s store was ever really successful, but do not answer definitively.

They raise unresolved questions about Julie, the captain and IA woman, Marcus's family, and Mike Lowry's money.

They end by saying they still don't fully know who to root for in the French and Indian War context or how much of the movie's politics should be read literally.

They debate unresolved world-building questions like the werewolf gene, the hair transformation, and how the movie's big sports moments would play in real life.

They end with speculative questions about how the afterlife works and how the characters would behave after the film’s events.

Their big unresolved joke question is what Bathsheba is up to in the present day.

They raise several plot logistics questions about the body, the gang, and law enforcement, but none can be answered from the film.

They agree the least believable element is how effortlessly both leads swing dance at such a high level.

They briefly toss around survival hypotheticals and a bigger-bummer question, but do not settle on a formal answer.

They ask a few speculative questions and settle most on how long the England relationship would realistically last.

They raise multiple time-travel and logic puzzles, but do not settle on a single answerable winner for the category.

They raise several unresolved puzzles, including Bo Callahan’s birthday-party story and how much of the movie’s football logic is supposed to be literal.

They raised open questions about what happened next for the Russian commander and whether the ending’s reconciliation really made sense.

They speculate about Phil’s post-loop life and whether he and Rita would last, but treat both as unresolved hypotheticals.

They settle on Lucy’s mother backstory as the main unanswered question, while also raising the movie’s crime count as a broader issue.

They spend the segment tossing around unanswered world-building questions about World War III, the NLF, Snake's prison life, and New York sports without resolving any of them.

They float several open questions, including what was in the briefcase and whether De Niro is a bad athlete, but no single answer is settled.

They speculate about what happened to Tyra Randall and Tyra Banks after the breakup, but no single answer is established.

They raise a flurry of impossible-to-resolve questions about sex, death, the timeline, and character behavior without a single winner.

They use the category to ask what happened to Sizemore’s career and physique between Heat and this movie.

The section turns into debate over the movie’s ambiguity and a few joking hypotheticals, without a single answer being settled.

They pose multiple unanswered story questions, led by the suspicion that Bo Derek may have poisoned Tommy Sr.

They raise several open questions, including Race Wars logistics, Dom's connections, the team's fighting skills, and whether Brian can ever return.

They estimate Cage died for roughly a year and jokingly blame Doug Liman for the election outcome.

He poses multiple unanswered questions about Chuck, Wilson, and the ending without settling any of them.

They pose a few plot-mechanics questions about the Night Fox and leave them without a definitive answer.

They raise multiple speculative questions and leave them unresolved, especially about Schofling's lost career path.

They float a few unresolved questions, led by whether Kaepernick drew inspiration from the film.

They ended on open-ended speculation about Cliff's wife and Rick's later career, with no definitive answer.

They toss out several open questions, including what The Wire borrowed from the movie and why certain roles were cast the way they were.

They discuss unresolved questions about Denzel’s daughters, Pennsylvania-action-movie comparisons, and Rosario Dawson’s career peak.

They ask open-ended questions about rooting for Tom, the Dickie-Tom dynamic, and who you would choose to be with, without settling them definitively.

They answer that Farrier is in a German POW camp and then use the category to argue the movie was snubbed.

The speakers compared several iconic calls and moments without settling decisively on one answer.

They mostly circle the question of what Silva's deeper relationship to M really was beyond the official story.

They posed hypothetical sequel and character questions, but the conversation stayed exploratory rather than picking one answer.

They question the ending logic, especially why Keaton gets his job back while the larger workplace fallout is ignored.

The segment moves into hypothetical casting for a remake, but no single answer is settled as definitive.

They pose several interpretive questions about motivation, relationships, and pizza quality without settling on definitive answers.

They pose several open questions about a remake, Dan and Beth’s marriage, Dan’s past behavior, and Alex’s background without reaching agreement.

They toss out unresolved questions about the ending, the child, and the film's logistics without settling on one answer.

They raise a cluster of open questions about Charlie, the shower scene, Maverick’s exit, and the film’s logistics without resolving them.

They debate questions like Landa's recognition of Shoshana and how she came to own the cinema without reaching a firm answer.

They pose several hypothetical sequel and timeline questions without settling any of them as a single answer.

They muse about Chigurh’s larger body count and the film’s realism around crime response, without reaching a firm answer beyond speculation.

They raise several open logic questions, especially about the Ferris wheel, recognition at Sarah Lawrence, and the kids’ reaction.

They toss around several mysteries, including Keating's wife/girlfriend, the soccer team, and the phone call prank, without settling them.

They throw out several unanswered logistics questions about the heist, the team, and the ending without settling on one answer.

They treat the roofie question as the main unsolved issue, then also wonder whether Alan could survive Tyson's punch and how the sequel premise should have changed.

They spend most of the category on the Continental’s access rules and the value of the gold coins, with Wick’s trip home another puzzle.

They tossed out speculative questions about Regina’s college destiny and the exact breakup timing for Katie and Aaron, but did not fully resolve them as winners.

The segment turns into a series of unresolved questions about the movie's logic, ghosts, and logistics.

They raise a few statistical and structural questions about the movie and then move on without resolving them definitively.

They pose a hypothetical about what Vivian would wear in a modern remake, but never settle on one answer.

They close by volleying several speculative questions about Roy Hobbs's off-screen life, the note, and the game's aftermath without resolving any of them.

They ended on an unresolved question about Holly Hunter’s character and her long-term romantic outcome.

They mostly discuss whether the Dracula puppet musical concept could work, and also poke at a couple of plausibility questions.

They raise several unanswered franchise questions without settling on a single definitive answer.

The segment turns into open-ended casting and sequel hypotheticals rather than a single agreed winner.

They raise several unresolved questions about geography, the Sonny hit, and Michael's postwar life without settling any of them.

They conclude Costner would not improve Tombstone and that the movie works better with Kurt Russell and the actual cast assembled.

They raise lingering plot questions about Lamar, the film's logic, and whether Brimley actually dies, but no single answer is established.

They treat the Deep Throat identity question as the central unresolved thought experiment, alongside a broader historical what-if about the movie’s influence.

They pose a string of speculative questions about the team, the dating outcomes, and the concert without settling on any single answer.

They pose a few questions about the plot and characters, but none are answered definitively in the room.

They pose several lingering logic questions about Knish, the money, Joe, and the ending, but do not resolve them as a category winner.

They speculate at length about the characters' long-term futures, but no single question is settled as the answer.

They raise several unresolved questions, including Theo’s basketball reference, the bearer bonds, the McClane marriage, and Carl’s return.

The segment raises several plot logic questions about masks, Jim Phelps, and the helicopter/train sequence without resolving them.

They toss out several hypothetical questions, but the most vivid one is what Quint was doing across the three decades before Jaws.

They pose several unresolved questions about the characters and production, including Stanley Tucci’s character and the end-game office list.

They pose several open questions about the story, including football, Jenny’s illness, and the feather symbolism, without resolving any of them.

The discussion stays speculative about dinosaur science, alternate versions of the film, and Spielberg's influence without settling on one answer.

The segment ends with open-ended sequel and plot questions about what happened in Vegas and what Jake Hoyt does next.

The segment includes questions about whether Zuck stole the Harvard connection and whether the movie was too harsh, but no answer is formally chosen.

They run through several open questions, but the Sonny-and-Isabella future is the main unresolved one they revisit.

They riff on hypothetical remakes and sequels, but the segment stays exploratory rather than producing one supportable answer.

They answer their own question by concluding that Jack Cates is simply a terrible cop.

They raise questions about Craig's box theft and motive, but no definitive answer is given in the discussion.

They raise several plot and production questions, but treat them as intentionally unanswerable rather than choosing a winner.

The discussion stays as a series of unanswered nitpicks about seasickness, Rose’s nationality, styling, and the corset plot.

They toss around hypotheticals about casting, action-movie titles, and the movie’s premise without settling any of them.

This section is presented as a list of open questions rather than a single resolved choice.