THE REWATCHABLES · March 18, 2026
A movie directed by N/A, covered in the complete Rewatchables archive.
ON THIS EPISODE
FROM THE CONVERSATION
WHY IT WORKS
WHAT DID NOT WORK
SCENES THEY KEPT COMING BACK TO
Bill ridicules the finale where Barrymore runs around the field and security seems absent.
Opening minutesThey argue over whether Snipes was actually a good enough basketball performer or just cut around carefully.
About 8 minThey single out Eisenberg's 'that's good' line as an all-time subtle read.
About 1:12Used as the canonical dinner-scene assassination because of the build-up and suspense.
About 24 minThey admire the premise because the money belt would help almost any protagonist who has been sacrificed for a principle.
About 32 minWHERE THEY DISAGREED
Bill SimmonsSome stars have obvious nadirs; others, like Denzel, barely have one.
Chris RyanCruise, De Niro, Pacino, Denzel, and Stallone each need different anti-apex choices.
Bill SimmonsHe dislikes narration, especially when it feels like a crutch.
Chris RyanThe best movies with narration are evidence that the stance is too rigid.
Bill SimmonsThe Godfather restaurant hit should win because of the buildup and importance.
Chris RyanSicario is up there, but The Godfather has more suspense and dramatic weight.
Bill SimmonsTim Robbins, John C. Reilly, Tom Cruise, Freddie Prinze Jr., or Wiley Wiggins could fit.
Chris RyanHe keeps narrowing toward a shortlist and suggests a vote rather than an immediate decision.
He strongly dislikes the movie and its inauthentic Boston-friend-group vibe.
Opening minutesHe likes it even while using it as an anti-apex Cruise example.
About 8 minHe reveres the movie and uses it to argue Denzel may not have a nadir.
About 8 minHe starts as anti-narration but concedes many great films use it well.
About 32 minHe thinks Cruise's public, polished persona would make Cocktail the best interview choice if the actor were on the pod in character.
About 56 minHe respects it but doesn't like it much and says it was a rough date-night movie.
About 1:20He admits he does not actively seek out animation, though he likes a few classics.
About 1:20Much of the episode is devoted to inventing and stress-testing new Rewatchables categories and awards.
About 8 minThe hosts debate career low points and reverse-apex moments for major stars like Cruise, De Niro, Pacino, Denzel, and Stallone.
About 8 minA major thread is how performance choices, line readings, narration, athleticism, and mispronunciation affect rewatchability.
About 16 minThe episode includes multiple ad breaks for Tremfya, TikTok, Fire TV, Quince, Angry Orchard, Mutiny, and Whole Foods.
Opening minutesThe hosts propose a Hall of Fame-style tiering system for Rewatchables figures, including Pantheon, special achievements, That Guy, and Dion Waiters-style first class.
About 1:04Bill says Christopher Walken and Philip Seymour Hoffman warrant special-recognition style placement.
About 1:04Bill says he and Craig should do a vote on the bad onscreen athleticism category.
About 8 minBill says he has previously broken his own anti-narration rule by praising many narrated films.
About 32 minUsed as a candidate for a personal 'number 16 Limitless' style favorite.
Opening minutesCraig uses it as an example of a goofy 2000s comedy he might rank highly.
Opening minutesUsed as a movie Bill despises for inauthentic Boston fandom and ridiculous security behavior.
Opening minutesReferenced as another movie with Fenway security and Boston-robbery shorthand.
Opening minutesUsed for dinner-scene assassination and line-reading debates in earlier Rewatchables discussion.
About 24 minHeld up as the definitive dinner-scene assassination sequence.
About 24 minUsed to discuss prop-based categories and why the movie remains timeless.
About 32 minSource of a favorite line-reading example from Jesse Eisenberg.
About 1:12Cited as the origin of 'Houston, we have a problem.'
About 1:20Listed as a movie that became a universal reference or joke.
About 1:20Referenced through the 'good day, sir' style classic line-reading discussion.
About 1:20 · medium confidenceReferenced in relation to graffiti and crew-member competence debates.
About 1:12Used as an example of a movie with a strong rewatchables-style running thesis and a great stranded hero performance.
About 1:04Named as the best Tom Cruise movie to discuss with Cruise in person if he were a guest.
About 56 minNamed as the best Tom Cruise movie to discuss if the interview were off-limits and fully candid.
About 56 minThe episode repeatedly jokes about celebrating Chris Ryan during a themed month of the show.
Opening minutesThey joke that Chris should be subbed out or load-managed like an NBA player when he gets wound up late in a pod.
Opening minutesA recurring bit about obscure props that only Rewatchables obsessives would recognize.
About 24 minThe hosts jokingly imply Craig's aggressive movie instincts point toward a future true-crime documentary.
About 40 minThey keep returning to precise line readings as a new award-worthy podcast category.
About 1:12“It's like attending my own funeral.”Opening minutes
“The online world moves fast.”Opening minutes
“Let it sit for a bit.”About 40 min
“That's good. You should be proud.”About 1:12
“You're going to love CR's Zane Lowe impression.”About 1:04
ON THE MIC
Bill SimmonsThe Rewatchables
Chris RyanThe RewatchablesREWATCH FAVS
Upvote it for the live listener ranking.
YOUR PROGRESS
Sign in with Google only when you want to save progress. The rest of the site stays public.
KEEP LISTENING
Play the episode directly from the official feed, open it on Spotify, or save it to your private Listen Later playlist.